Group „Urban“
Stephan Riegger (Berlinbewegt e.V.)
Fr. Eisenbarth (Schule)
Lucia Lancerin (Italien/MS 21)
Francesco Schiera (Italien/MS 21)
Libor Flemr (Prag/ MS 21)
Asdis (Island/MS 21)
Victoria Musgrave (England/MS 21)
Bianca Heinrich (D/MS 21)
Alexander Kaczmarek (D/MS 21)
„ Criticism ”
Bus stop:
dangerous (traffic)
needs equipment for children to play while they wait
Brook:
no water
very attractive for children but playing there is forbidden
Path walk / street:
boring
no motivation for movement
not enough lights
not enough signs for cars ( attention - school, please drive slowly etc.)
Fences:
not strong and high enough (children climb over to enter the schoolyard when it´s closed)
Public playgrounds:
need more attractive equipment to entertain children
combination playgrounds and schoolyard
„ Fantasy ”
Bus stop:
games area
balancing
sitting benches, painted by children
no dogs
Brook:
water canal
fishing pool
zip line
bridge(s) of different materials and hights
swing
Path walk / street:
shared pavement (one part is for pedestrians and the other one is for games)
skating
cycling
roller-skating
paintings on the path walk (hop scotch)
moving equipment
lights
signs (painted by children)
Fences / Public playgrounds:
open schoolyard in the afternoon
connecting the schoolyard with the other playgrounds
if not possible: improving the playgrounds around
using the urban surroundings for lessons (biology, sports, art etc.)
„ Construction ”
“Waiting at the Bus stop: Game and play area”
Group URBAN II (Lucia Lancerin; Francesco Schiera)
Proposals for a Participative Planning Process
Planning group:
architects
city planners
teachers
Other people involved:
district authority
headmaster
pupils
parents
grand parents
school caretakers
neighbours
shopkeepers
housing company
Money:
local association
church
other sponsors
Questions:
Is the school a stranger corp in the district?
Do parents and inhabitants use the spaces of the school?
How many pupils can work in the p.p. process?
|